


















El Pomar CEO's new goal: improving world's view of U.S. The Gazette, April 1, 2008
Cambodian opposition leader calls for new FBI probe into bombing Agence France-Presse, March 30, 2008
U.S. shifting funds away from Miami anti-Castro groups The Miami Herald, March 30, 2008
Pakistan Will Talk With Militants Who Give Up Arms Bloomberg, March 29, 2008
US Support for Musharraf Causes Anger Associated Press, February 29, 2008
Islamists' loss in Pakistan isn't a U.S. win Los Angeles Times, February 26, 2008
Pakistan militants call for dialogue Associated Press, February 25, 2008
Reinventing Pakistan Chicago Tribune Editorial, February 23, 2008
more >>
|
|
|
|
Uganda
 |
Advancing Democracy in Uganda |
 |
|
|
|
The International Republican Institute (IRI) first began work in Uganda in April 2003, when the institute produced a public opinion poll designed to explore Ugandan notions of democracy and governance. During the 2004 constitutional amendment debate, IRI supported dialogues and seminars that increased popular involvement in the 2005 transition from a no-party state to a multi-party system.
In February 2006, political parties competed in the first multi-party elections held in Uganda since 1986. IRI conducted trainings and workshops aimed at developing political parties into viable organizations which could compete effectively with each other at the polls.
Strengthening Political Pluralism
IRI focuses on strengthening political pluralism in Uganda through strengthening political parties and civil society organizations. By supporting the development of institutions, IRI builds their capacity to engage directly in the political arena. IRI also works with political parties and civil society to ensure that their engagement in the political arena is issue-based, inclusive and relevant to the priorities of the citizenry. In addition to supporting the organizational development of parties and civil society organizations, IRI holds public dialogues, radio programs, seminars, interactive workshops and networking meetings. These activities provide forums for issue-based dialogue and debate. They also provide opportunities for training, networking, experiential learning and more constructive engagement between political parties and civil society organizations.
Civil Society Development
An additional component of this program is a series of small grants, issued to Ugandan organizations who are working to advance democracy by strengthening civil society networks. Through its sub-grantees, such as the Ugandan Association of Women Lawyers, the Uganda Joint Christian Council, the Mubende Disabled Women's Association, and the Uganda Youth Network, IRI has assisted Ugandan civic organizations over the last two years to implement activities such as public dialogues, radio programs and other forms of advocacy. Building the capacity of these organizations to effectively manage grants and engage directly in politics has also contributed to Uganda's emerging civil society.
Political Party Development
IRI also has contributed to the development of political parties at the national and local level. Through capacity building and training programs for political parties, including its unique local party leaders' academies held throughout the country, it has helped parties to gain basic tools needed to build their parties after a long period of a no-party system. IRI's support has boosted the capacity of parties to carry out specific reforms, including building their research units, revising their constitutions, developing strategic plans and other such reforms.
Mainstreaming Gender Issues in Political Parties
IRI has broadened its scope to focus on women by mainstreaming gender issues in political parties. Considering the nascent stage of development of many of Uganda's political parties, the institute believes it is imperative to include women in decision-making processes and install them as political party leaders from the very beginning stages of party development. Calling on the examples of other African countries such as Rwanda, South Africa and Namibia - where women have particularly strong representation and are powerful political players - IRI has contributed to the integration of women into Uganda's political parties. Most notably, all of the parties have set quotas for female representation in their leadership structures, which illustrates the significant role women are playing in Ugandan political parties.
Public Opinion Polling
IRI is well-known in Uganda for its public opinion polling. The institute has fielded nationwide polls in May 2003, May 2005, and January 2006. Through these widely-publicized public opinion polls, IRI has been able to track emerging trends in Ugandans' association with political parties and their opinions on important issues such as multi-party politics, term limits, and the safety of the electoral process. The institute is working to broaden the use of public opinion polling by educating political parties about how they can use polling to achieve their strategic objectives.
Candidate Debates
In the lead up to the February 2006 elections, IRI sponsored a series of candidate debates at the parliamentary level as well as a live televised debate for the presidential candidates. Additionally, IRI trained more than 900 political party poll watchers, who played an integral role in ensuring an open and transparent electoral process. The institute also fielded a team of 30 observers to assess the elections in two districts in Uganda's southwest countryside.
|
 |
Uganda's Road to Democracy |
 |
|
|
|
Starting with Yoweri Museveni's ascension to the presidency in 1986, the Ugandan political landscape was dominated by the National Resistance Movement (NRM or the Movement), a "no-party" form of organization that was developed to overcome sectarianism in Uganda's politics. Under the Movement system, elective office was contested on individual merit rather than along party, ethnic or regional lines. Movement leaders blamed these divisions for the civil wars of the past.
Under the constitutional provisions adopted in 1995, the Movement system was to remain in effect for five years, with severe restrictions on political party activity. The 1995 constitution also stated that a referendum would take place in 2000, through which Ugandans could then determine whether to implement a multiparty system of democracy. In March 2000, 91 percent of voters elected to keep the Movement system, although the referendum was widely criticized for low voter turnout and a lack of transparency. While both presidential and legislative elections were held in 2001, the government continued to promote the Movement system, and most executive and legislative power was vested in officials who advocate Movement political views.
In January 2003, however, Museveni made an announcement recommending the adoption of multiparty politics. Among reasons cited for this political shift were the importance of the economy and the preferences of donor countries (and hence their markets) for multiparty systems. At the same time, the government released a statement indicating its intention to eliminate term limits, which would require constitutional amendment.
In July 2005, Ugandans went to the polls to vote in another referendum on multiparty politics. Though turnout was only around 41 percent of registered voters, the referendum passed with 93 percent of the vote, thereby officially legalizing political parties and ending the no-party state.
The National Resistance Movement registered as a political party, the NRM Organization. The Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) is one of the strongest opposition parties, followed by the Ugandan People's Congress (UPC) and the Democratic Party (DP). There are numerous smaller political parties, including the Conservative Party (CP) and Justice Forum (JEEMA).
To allow Museveni to stand for a third elected term, Parliament overwhelmingly passed a constitutional amendment eliminating term limits in July 2005. The 2006 presidential and parliamentary election campaigns were heated. Opposition presidential candidate Dr. Kizza Besigye of the FDC returned from four years of exile in South Africa. A few short weeks after his homecoming, Besigye was jailed and charged with treason and for rape. Besigye faced trials in both military and civil courts, although the military tribunal charges were eventually dropped. He was released on bail on January 2, however, constant court appearances limited his campaign.
Museveni was victorious in his bid for a third term in office in the February 23, 2006 presidential election, winning 60 percent of the vote. Besigye won 37 percent.
Most observers described the 2006 presidential and parliamentary elections as the most peaceful in Uganda's recent history. They also found that electoral procedures on Election Day were conducted in a more professional and orderly fashion. Observers raised concern, however, about the lack of a level playing field in the period leading up to the elections. They cited unequal access to state media, misuse of government resources, harassment of opposition candidate Besigye, and trends of bribery and intimidation in the immediate pre-election period. In addition, lack of civic education, limited training of polling officials, an inefficient complaints process, and late passage of electoral law had a negative impact on the conduct of the elections.
As Uganda looks forward, the political parties have shifted their focus towards the next election cycle, planned for 2011, when presidential, legislative, and municipal/local council elections are expected. All of the parties are looking at the lessons learned from the 2006 elections and are evaluating how best they can use their election experience to be more competitive in 2011.
|
|
|
|
Political Overview
Head of Government: President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, National Resistance Movement
Type of Government: republic
Suffrage: universal, age 18
Elections Calendar
Program Overview
Focus of Program: strengthening political pluralism, public opinion polling, gender mainstreaming
Funding Source: United States Agency for International Development, National Endowment for Democracy, British High Commission, Royal Netherlands Embassy, Donor Democracy and Governance Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|