79
        
        
          these changes depend on the existence of clearly demarcated roles and responsibilities of staff
        
        
          members, including job descriptions.
        
        
          
            5.
          
        
        
          
            Strengthen internal reporting and archiving systems
          
        
        
          There is a need to improve internal reporting and archiving systems in order to provide a basis
        
        
          for greater communication, access to information, transparency and historical accuracy; and
        
        
          while this area was not a major priority for workshop participants, it did emerge as a key
        
        
          concern during interviews.  The nexus of this is strengthening the existing Hansard system
        
        
          which currently has few staff who have received sufficient training.  Arguably, this is an ideal
        
        
          window of opportunity to utilize the foreign study trip approach in order to expose staff to
        
        
          Hansard reporting systems.  Thinking more widely, there is a considerable level of support
        
        
          among members of parliament in both chambers to improve how information about the work of
        
        
          parliament is gathered and stored in a central database, shared through regular parliamentary
        
        
          gazettes or bulletins, and made available to the public (thereby linking with the strategic
        
        
          communications sub-category).  To an extent, addressing weaknesses in internal
        
        
          communications will facilitate better external communications, while also helping to promote a
        
        
          better relationship between the two chambers.
        
        
          
            6.
          
        
        
          
            Address the skills-remit ‘mismatch’ within the Guurti
          
        
        
          In addition to the need to clarify the arrangements for (s)electing
        
        
          
            Guurti
          
        
        
          members, on the basis
        
        
          of interviews it is further recommended that the apparent “mismatch” between the widening role
        
        
          and remit of the
        
        
          
            Guurti
          
        
        
          and the entry requirements for members is addressed.  The two entry
        
        
          points here are to either review the remit of the
        
        
          
            Guurti
          
        
        
          in order to ensure their remit matches
        
        
          members’ skillset, or to review entry requirements in order to ensure that the chamber possesses
        
        
          adequate capacity to review and draft legislation.
        
        
          Independent of which route is taken, there is a further need to revisit the
        
        
          
            Guurti’s
          
        
        
          “traditional”
        
        
          functions that relate directly to peace and security and ensure that the chamber is able to fulfill
        
        
          this important role.  The most significant challenge facing
        
        
          
            Guurti
          
        
        
          members in this regard is their
        
        
          lack of transportation, and, increasingly, a lack of legitimacy for members who are in post not
        
        
          through election but by inheritance.  Nevertheless, in a context where peace and security is a
        
        
          major concern, particularly in the east of the country, the
        
        
          
            Guurti
          
        
        
          offers a sensible entry point for
        
        
          pursuing localized dispute resolution.
        
        
          
            7.
          
        
        
          
            Address problems relating to leadership structures within parliament
          
        
        
          Although there was a level of disagreement between members of parliament and members of
        
        
          parliamentary leadership of the House of Representatives, it would appear that there are a
        
        
          number of issues relating to the committee structure that need to be addressed.  In particular,
        
        
          participants were keen to emphasize the apparent lack of power the heads of committees possess
        
        
          when executing their functions.  The high level of concern regarding the apparent “dictatorship
        
        
          of the speaker” within the lower house is concerning and requires further investigation, in line
        
        
          with strengthening the capacity of committees to fulfill their oversight function (see below).
        
        
          This also relates to a wider issue of how roles and responsibilities of various actors within
        
        
          parliament are defined, communicated and understood, with a high demand from members of