Amman, Jordan – On January 23, 2013, Jordanians went to the polls to choose a new parliament in an election that was an important step toward building Jordanian voters’ trust in election administration. And while improved Election Day procedures, carried out under the supervision of Jordan’s new Independent Election Commission (IEC), underscore a more transparent process, the electoral framework continues to fall short.
Elections are a process, which include the campaign period, Election Day, ballot counting, adjudication of complaints and acceptance of results. The electoral process cannot be separated from the political and legal framework within which it operates. For democracy to advance in Jordan, inequities in the election law must be addressed, such as districting that does not treat all votes equally. In IRI’s 2010 statement on Jordan’s parliamentary elections, IRI noted “the system of districting does not ensure equitable representation for all Jordanians. The over-representation of rural districts is accentuated by the controversial single non-transferable vote system [SNTV], thus further diluting the representation of urban voters.”
Reforms instituted under the new electoral law do not sufficiently address these inequalities. The addition of national list seats (27 out of 150 seats) elected by proportional representation did little to steer Jordan towards the development of national political parties founded on common platforms. Addressing such shortfalls is needed for a more empowered parliament built on political parties to come to fruition.
Despite this, Jordan’s 2013 elections were a step forward from the country’s 2010 elections due largely to the establishment of the IEC. IRI’s delegation, which was deployed in all 12 governorates and observed at more than 175 polling stations, found election officials to be well-trained and knowledgeable about their roles, willing to engage with observers and accessible at all levels. The IEC took important steps toward establishing itself as an impartial election management body by improving the voters’ list, carrying out efficient candidate and national list registrations, issuing preprinted ballots, and administering a transparent Election Day process. The IEC should also be commended for hosting more than 150 international election observers in a manner consistent with the United Nations Declaration on International Election Observation and for facilitating their work and the of work of a robust contingent of citizen observers throughout the country.
As noted in IRI’s pre-election assessment report, one area for improvement for the IEC to address is the voter registration process. While the registration process led to a more accurate voter list, group registration, allowed under the law, lends itself to fraud or to some individuals being registered against their will.
A positive attribute of the 2013 elections was a more open environment for campaigning and public discourse that helped remove previous taboos on being politically active and speaking one’s mind. Throughout the election process, candidates and citizens were allowed the space to discuss aspects of government and public life that were previously off limits. IRI also commends the IEC for the provision of one-minute of free air time on national television to all registered candidates and lists. This provided candidates with greater opportunity to present themselves to voters.
Another important step taken by Jordanian authorities was improved enforcement of laws pertaining to alleged vote buying and other influence peddling around elections with notable arrests of candidates and agents accused of using money or gifts to illegally influence the process. Nonetheless, IRI’s delegation heard numerous allegations of vote buying on Election Day that were not limited to one region. For Jordanians to recognize a sustained and impartial commitment to stopping the practice of vote buying, current cases must be fully adjudicated through a due process and laws must be enforced equally for all groups.
In addition, in future elections, Jordan should strengthen rules regulating the conduct of candidate agents inside and around polling centers. Enforcement of rules against Election Day campaigning outside polling centers must also be significantly improved upon, or the law amended, before the next election, as IRI’s delegation witnessed campaigning in violation of the current law outside the majority of polling centers visited. An improved definition of campaigning under the current law may be another way to address this shortcoming. Improved candidate and party financial disclosure regulations would additionally contribute to building greater voter awareness in future elections.
With regard to the electoral framework – the dominant SNTV system – tribal allegiances continue to be the major factor in candidate selection and campaigning, with personality trumping platforms. The introduction of national proportional list seats may begin to address this challenge, but the number of seats elected by national list should be increased if a meaningful change in parliament’s composition is to be realized. Likewise, national lists would have had a greater impact on encouraging political party participation if competition on lists had been limited to political parties. Notwithstanding a more free campaign environment, these factors, plus a rushed election schedule, left little time for voters to make informed choices and did not result in competition based on party or list platform.
With respect to women’s representation, the new electoral law did not increase the percentage of women in the national parliament. In addition, Jordan’s system of allocating seats to women re-enforces the same inequities between rural and urban districts seen in other areas of the electoral law. To ensure that more women are elected and serve in parliament, Jordan needs to expand women’s representation and institute an equitable method of allocating women’s seats.
Currently, there is little connection between votes won and power conveyed to election winners due to parliament’s weak mandate and limited governing authority. A long-term solution to improving the quality of electoral competition, and potentially lessening the practice of vote buying, would be to increase the powers of the national parliament, thus increasing the value voters place on their parliamentary vote.
IRI’s delegation makes the following preliminary recommendations as a roadmap for improving future Jordanian elections. The recommendations will be further elaborated on in a full report IRI will issue in the coming months.
- Build on the IEC’s good start in election administration by making the institution more independent, with its own full-time staff and direct access to investigative and policing bodies, and allow IEC leadership to serve out their full terms.
- Set future election dates before voter registration begins, and register lists and candidates at least six months before Election Day to ensure the public has time to fully consider their choices.
- If substantial changes are made to the election law, provide a minimum period of three months or more for voter education efforts before the start of voter registration to ensure that voters clearly understand their rights and opportunities to participate fully in the election process.
- Ensure a vote has equal weight throughout the country by establishing uniform guidelines based on population and then conducting redistricting.
- Stimulate party development by restricting national list competition to parties and by increasing the number of seats in parliament elected by national proportional list.
- Establish clear financial disclosure regulations and enforcement mechanisms for candidates and lists that require the public posting of all funds spent on campaigning and the origin of those funds.
Support stronger judicial and criminal enforcement mechanisms for alleged electoral crimes, including vote buying, vote selling and coercion, financial or otherwise, to influence political support.
Other members of IRI’s delegation were:
- Petr Bratský, member of the Czech Republic Senate;
- Christopher Carr, Vice President at J.P. Morgan;
- Darryl Gray, former member of the Canadian Parliament;
- James Hart, former member of the Canadian Parliament;
- Steve Heydemann, Senior Adviser for Middle East Initiatives at the United States Institute of Peace;
- Tami Longaberger, Chief Executive Officer of the Longaberger Company, member of IRI’s Board of Directors and Chair of the Arab Women’s Leadership Institute’s Board of Directors;
- Matt Rhoades, former Chief of Staff to Governor Mitt Romney;
- David Schenker, Aufzien Fellow and Director of the Program on Arab Politics at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy;
- Christopher Tuttle, Director of the Washington Program at the Council on Foreign Relations; and
David Vriesendorp, Member of the Board of Directors of the Eduardo Frei Foundation in the Netherlands.
IRI staff also served as observers and assisted in the mission. IRI staff was led by Judy Van Rest, Executive Vice President of IRI; Scott Mastic, Director of Middle East and North Africa programs; and Jeff Lilley, Resident Country Director for IRI in Jordan.
Since 1983, IRI has monitored more than 150 elections in more than 46 countries, including Jordan’s 2010 parliamentary elections.Top